Friday, April 8, 2016

Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice Review

Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice
Director: Zack Snyder
Cast Headliners : Ben Affleck, Henry Cavill, Jesse Eisenberg, Amy Adams
Original Release Date : March 25th, 2016
  Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice is an interesting situation. It's one part a “Man of Steel 2”, following up on that 2013 Superman reboot. Yet also, after the end of the “Nolan trilogy” of Batman film's in 2012, it serves as a reboot of Batman for a new film generation. Lastly, it serves as the first major mixing of DC aspects together in their live action “extended universe” to set up a film franchise for years ahead (ala Marvel.) How does it do....? A wide variety of results, from the great , the muddled, the ugly. But it can't be called un-ambitious.

One can tell from the get go that this is certainly another take on this universe through the lense of Zack Snyder. It's expected on any Batman reboot checklist that his origin is shown, and of course it is here with the murder of his parents as seen so often before in other media. This immediately shows the slightly surreal, comic book panel (this film with a very large The Dark Knight Returns influence) take on the world Snyder deploys through extra dramatic music(But great, courtesy of Han Zimmer. Effective when orchestral, taking some adjusting to when techno and metal are used in later action sequences) and slow motion larger than life imagery of Bruce and the bats. The movie makes an effective use of the criticism against the ending of Man of Steel, by showing first hand the older Bruce Wayne/Batman (Ben Affleck)'s reaction to the carnage caused by that film's ending and his distrust of Superman/Clark Kent (Henry Cavill) because of this.

A primary shining aspect of the film is this take on Batman. Ben “Battfleck” gives a wonderful performance both in and out of costume. Within it, he offers a fierce demeanor right from the comic pages and feels like a natural for it. In his civilian persona, he even more shows his combination of anger, sorrow, and determination to take down his enemies. It must be noted that this is the most cynical and mean Batman shown on screen to date, surpassing even a few comic iterations. He can be extra fearsome and is even willing to let a few casualities happen on the way. But it works through Affleck's performance and fits , for better or worse, within the dark iteration Snyder has crafted. The film does a good job with its scenes and delivering concerning Batman's motivation for doing what he wants to do. The only other true element from this side of the coin is iconic butler Alfred (Jeremy Irons), and he offers a great , humorous , sarcasting take on the character that meshes well with Battfleck. It makes one perhaps wish for a film focusing more on these two without the clutter that is around for much of the rest of BvS but when they do appear they are solid. As the above is about as much “reboot” as the movie gives for Batman's slice of the world.

The other main chunk of the film comes from Superman's perspective in leading up to the titular fight. Cavill once again is a solid take on the character, offering the requisite charisma when need be and expanding to a range of anger, coolness, or whatever else comes up. The movie explores more of the deeper themes from Man of Steel at length, and while some are good the point is hammered home just a bit too slightly. However throughout it, the scenes actually featuring him himself are good, despite being lost occasionally in the tapestry of it all.

While its titular leads are solid, its the third person who takes up the most screen-time that is also one of its major sore thumbs. Iconic business mogul Lex Luthor (Jesse Eisenberg) is what ties the hero together acts as its primary villainous force. He is, to say the least, a very weak villain. While Eisenberg is capable of bringing the menace at times with evil doing, most of his appearances are taken up by failed attempts at humor. Or perhaps its when he attempts to come off as “unhinged” mentally but just frustrates the viewer. Now although (long hair or not) is not an accurate portrayal of the comic character, it doesn't matter since he comes off less as a villian and more as a waste of time.
The rest of the supporting cast is... alright. From here come the few specks of minuscule humor in what is a otherwise very dour film. There's Superman's love Lois Lane (Amy Adams) getting a lot of focus carrying on from her Man of Steel attributes. There's her and Clark's editor Perry White (Laurence Fishbourne) bringing some wise quips but little else. Much the same is to misc characters like Martha Kent (Diane Lane), memories of Jonathan Kent(Kevin Costner) , Mercy Graves (Tao Okamoto) , Wallace Keefe(Scoot McNairy) acting as minor plot advancers. Everyone is decent but nothing strikes out remarkably but doesn't detract too much either. There's a lot going on and a lot to cover in its role which makes sense. Even Zod( Michael Shannon) shows up in some way, perhaps connected to that CGI . Thing known as “Doomsday.”

While the film has a mostly compelling Batman vs Superman central arc, it also acts to bring in the larger DC Comics universe through easter eggs and moreso. Diana Prince (Gal Gadot), known more to many as Wonder Woman has a level of involvement here. However it is very brief both as civilian and hero. Gadot has some slight charisma and mystique to her, and later perhaps fighting bravado which is welcome to see, but the film does not give enough time with her to give an incredible confidence in her leading her own film. However, she is a cool presence that's great to finally have on-screen in this modern cinematic age. The other Justice League and DCU influences are.... interesting, perhaps could have been handled better but do work in settting up the larger saga ahead very slightly. A dedicated fan will be delighted, and a more newcomer or outsider will be perhaps confused a bit. But this was the film that needed to do them, and those may be fleshed out in the many sequels ahead.

The film, in usual Snyder style, takes a very long time to be set up. The first 2/3's or so are devoid of most action and tension. This makes it a slightly different film from other blockbusters in the market today. Though once it gets going, it is very much worth it. The action spectacle, from the central final hero showdown to other action elements that come into play, are pretty stellar to see. The movie pushes past reality into frenetic scenes right from the comic books, and then some. If one has enjoyed Snyder's action in the past this pushes the envelope to some crazy stuff. That makes the mistakes with the villians and the occasional plot progression slowdown mostly worth it. The tension and payoff will get one excited to finally see a wider DC universe rolling when the time delivers.


Batman vs Superman is far from perfect. The movie's surreal tone and action may cause some ire with those who have a very specific want from these characters. There are some performances lame (Luthor..) to forgettable. There is a lot of buildup and a slight overabundance of the melodramatic deeper themes present. But though, despite some of Snyder's choices, he delivers a action packed thrill ride of DC mixing when result appears that will make dreams override cinematic construction quality. 8.71 out of 10

Friday, March 25, 2016

Video Game Review: Batman : Arkham Knight

 (spoilers) Overallll..... I loved it, wonderful game. The visuals are amazzzzzzzzzing, like seriously one of the best looking of the PS4 generation and I'm glad they were able to squeeze so much out of it not possible before. The ground combat was as sweet as ever, polished to a near perfect smooth height with little new additions besides some tricks to use but otherwise I relied on my same favorites. Especially hype were the few moments when there was team up moments with Robin and Nightwing etc. Same with the stealth predator gameplay, which was as intense as ever with some excellent set pieces and even in the side content. The teaming up with Robin was especially awesome in the one and only stealth room with him in Panessa Studios, hnnnggg that whole section (Dat joker song too). But the thing is, while all of this was the franchises' best, there was a little less than there should ahve been.
But moreso, there was a big elephant in the room many noticed. Or rather a elephant sized vehicle. While the batmobile finally being in was a awesome idea and looks cool, it's fun to drive and do things in short burst race an combat. But the game adds soooooo many random tank combat arenas , throughout th whole dang story, it gets old but one bears it as part of the package , And like a Cobra tank is fun to fight the first time, but not the last. And grrrr that Arkham Knight tank boss fight.... and its always faster to glide
These things are only a moderate big negative on a otherwise amazing game. Gamewide, incredible voice acting and moments from batman's nearly entire universe friend and villian. The main arc was pretty epic and Jason Todd encounters , especially later (dat red hood boss fight) were intense and feels. Wish there was a bit more with him post-reveal, but it worked. Scarecrow was a interesting foe. These both were heightened greatly however by the prescence of Joker. omg, bravo mark hammil. I didnt really know just how much he'd be in it before playing, and he is... and gets into some scary, funny, deep stuff in Batman's mind for a great central struggle at those moments. Weirdly, it was like the two were working together....woah. This game had joker at his joker-ist of the whole series, and he wasnt even technically alive!
While the main plot had those highlights, the villian-focused side quests had some great gameplay and plot stuff too. Whether it was penguin's arenas, two-faces bank robberies, the pyg boss fight, or others those were great. less so for hush, but its not a perfect game. But this game is packed with content and truly became open world that the series was inching torwards.
Of course with these, I also play DLC. and focused on the core. There's the solid (ps4 only scarecrow nightmare's offering the boss fight and tripping out that never realy happened in the main game), eh (the harley and red hood "episodes"), and the... great. he most wanted missions for mr.freeze, ras al ghul, killer croc, and mad hatter rivaled their City appearances and realy should have been part of the main game, bringing their storys to close, but short and so sweet.
Oh, the post game ending unlock requirements again....broken grrr, very specific amounts needed and messed up so had to youtube it...still powerful..
At the end of the day, it wasnt a perfect end. But its shiny, fun conten packed, epic....if not as what it could have been as it shoulda been. But a fine ending, and when its good, its quite great. 9.3 out of 10.
Arkham City > Arkham Knight > Arkham Asylum > Arkham Origins, all good times. lets see what hardcore batman games and rocksteady do next someday....

Friday, March 18, 2016

The Brothers Grimsby Review

The Brothers Grimsby
Director: Louis Letterier
Cast Headliners : Sacha Baron Cohen, Mark Strong
Original Release Date : March 11th, 2016


 Sacha Baron Cohen excels when he nearly fully makes the movie about his latest wacky character. Whether it was Ali G's love of rap, or Borat/Bruno/General Aladeen's clever yet unique stereotypes his comedy films have been a wonky and ridiculous funny ride through a set of shenanigans in a outside world. The Brothers Grimsby has many of these elements, but not handled the best. But its certainly not ..uneventful and without chuckles.

The latest creation here is Nobby (Sacha Baron Cohen), a British extremely dedicated and extremely dumb soccer hooligan who lives in Grimsby. He's been separated from his brother Sebastian (Mark Strong) since birth, and he randomly runs into him again after many years at the latter
s job.... as a MI6 spy agent. This premise , largely seen in the trailer as will be gotten into later, soon leads to them on a globe trotting adventure.
While Cohen's movies have never exactly had incredible plots, they usually have had slightly more substance than this. The story is weak and generic which serves as a slight canvas to paint Nobby's idiocy against but its mainly there to exist as a place to hold a series of gross and silly jokes. The “outside” world in this film is not the mainstream like the past few films in this “Series” but what could have been interesting is for the most part floating in the background.
What does succeed, one of the few things that do in this film, is the pairing between Nobby and Sebastian. Cohen can sometimes have a good line to cause laughs here, but more than ever is just a bit player in a avalanche of extreme silly. Likewise Strong's Sebastian is pretty suave and charismatic on his own, much like the other British genre characters he no doubt parodies, but when the two brothers are mixed together shenanigans ensure. Their wildly clashing personality types make for some good jokes and there's a warm, albeit lukewarm, comedic chemistry between them which is something that hasn't been seen since Borat and perhaps even improves on that film's duo slightly.
Unfortunately, while its funny to see Sebastian being as grimly serious as he is in this silly comedy, it's less so exciting to see the film's attempts at action scenes. For some reason they are often filmed in the first person, which can be nauseatic besides a brief couple of comedic uses. The visual effects are subpar and attempted cool moments are usually brief or weakly anticlimatic. The same “Why” can be said for the far too many “emotional” flashbacks to the brother's childhood which detract from the mood.
The film gave away most of it moments and laughs in the trailers leading up to its release. There's not much more besides momentary, rarely effective , chuckles from bits involving Nobby's wife Dawn (Rebel Wilson) and 11 meme named kids, Sebastian's spy commander (Ian McShane), philathronpist Rhonda George (Penelope Cruz), or South African maid Banu (Gabourey Sidibe). They are all featured at parts but get lost in a parade of silliness that can't quite find its direction. In fact, Sidibe's sequence is one of the few positively memorable parts as it features Nobby attempting to be a secret agent and adopting a bad Sean Connery accent as cover due to circumstances. It has the film keeping direction on a gag for more than a few moments, and its the better tier for it.
What, for the most part, wasn't shown in the trailers was the typical Cohen levels of grossout and extreme gags that could never appear in any ad. He truly seems to have tried to break past the scale of his past edgy moments , to mixed results. While most are so shocking they can't be forgotten, that's not always a good thing. This movie isn't for a queasy person, or someone expect substance from their gross out parts for that matter. There's a extreme amount of these gags involving sex , disease, and violence. There's more than most comedies and even his past works and such;while some may find these moments extremely humorous their frequency and substitution for what he does best couldn't be exactly called the best approach to how to have made this film. The levels of shock is even to a point in some cases that it even seems to be to the point of parody, but actually... here it is not.

The Brother Grimsby has a lot of problems and is far from Sacha Baron Cohen's best work. However, it is not his worst either. Nobby makes for a decently funny new character, at times, and his interaction with his brother Sebastian is truly decent. There's a few other miscellaneous alright jokes mixed in as well and momentary clever parodies of British and spy tropes. But these bits of good are buried in a lot of extreme muck. But as said, it isn't forgettable. Not entirely for pleasant reasons though. 6.9 out of 10  

10 Cloverfield Lane Review

10 Cloverfield Lane
Director: Dan Trachtenberg 
Cast Headliners : Mary Elizabeth Winstead, John Goodman
Original Release Date : March 11th, 2016

             10 Cloverfield Lane is an incredibly interesting situation. The movie, originally seen on release schedules and in the industry as “The Cellar” and “Valencia” seemed to be an original idea about a man trapping someone in a basement. No franchise connections, no supernatural connections, little else knowng besides Mary Elizabeth Winstead and John Goodman's involvement. Well in typical fashion of JJ Abrams (producer only here), it was revealed at the last minute to be part of the Cloverfield franchise. But fortunately for it, what that means is very little as its a film that stands very much on its own unique merits for the most part. Compared to the wonky first-person camera and monster movie destruction of that this film is a extremely more contained, better looking, and overall film than that.

The film starts as Michelle (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) leaves her partner and life behind to head off into the countryside. The film quickly shifts from dark to shocking as she become involved in a car accident and wakes up locked away in the deep underground cell of Howard (John Goodman) who resides there along with Emmett (John Gallagher Jr). Michelle is terrified and knows little of what's going on, as does the audience. If this situation wasn't tense enough, Howard soon claims that the world has suffered a apocalyptic event and the three of them must now survive in his shelter. But what's unknown is if he's telling the truth.
The movie essentially just has these three character's for its entire duration, which makes for a dramatic, dark, and isolated set of circumstances. Each is strongly defined on their own. MEW does solidly as Michelle, who shows a resourceful and eventually even heroic side over the course of the film as she goes from captive to more. Emmett offers more of a average joe, non-questioning role in this. Their interplay is pretty good, and then things are raised the more Howard is given a chance to “Shine.”
Goodman's Howard is an great , unique, dark presence to the film. It's very much outside of type for him, and he offers a scene chewing role as his crazed conspiracy theorist. He's crazy, loony, fearsome, and creepy all at once. To delve more would give away spoilers that are so key to this experience, but suffice to say Howard is definitely unforgettable and a enigma and foil to the other two residents in the bunker. This film does a much better job at making one care about its characters, whether good or evil, then many in the genre and especially its predecessor. Whether feeling stressed or even the natural and surprising chuckle, it all works solidly.
The scenes and plot progression make for a intense set of possible lies and close calls. The situation seems to change every few moments as more possible truths are revealed and things happen. The pacing makes a pretty delicate blend between dramatic arguments typical of the genre and chances to delve a bit deeper emotionally or humorously. This is aided by solid, and thankfully normal, directing by Dan Trachetnberg. Perhaps one gripe is that even with this new perspective some things remain a bit unclear at times in frenetic sequences, but perhaps that's intentional.
While most of the film is a interesting and creepy descent into a web of lies and human madness, it must be said that a portion of it is very different, from whence it gets the “Cloverfield” in its name. Without revealing specifics, it nearly feels like a different movie and perhaps a bit “tacked on.” But only slightly so, and that's due to its...contents. But it fits into the climatic events around which it occurs and by the point it occurs in the narrative, its a natural and exciting fit.

For a movie with a small set of characters in basically a single location, 10 Cloverfield Lane packs a pretty big punch. It blows away the franchise it is tacked onto, and sets itself as its own identity. From its heroes to its , surprisingly human, scary opposing forces its a solid set of lies and intense situations. 8.1 out of 10

Friday, February 26, 2016

Oscar Predictions/Thoughts 2016

   The time is here again to look back on the ultimate critical acclaimed (more or less) movies of the year via the Oscars. I have to say I am incredibly happy with some of the choices on here, one of my more personally favorite choices ever. So for awards I care about, like usual, I will post my predicitons and wants:

Best Picture

  • The Big Short
  • Bridge of Spies
  • Brooklyn
  • Mad Max: Fury Road
  • The Martian
  • The Revenant
  • Room
  • Spotlight

Who I want to win: I think of this last, I would be equally happy with The Revenant or Mad Max ….surprised both made it onto a list like this, amazing amazing films in the top of 2015. I would also take that “surprise and liking” factor for The Martian as well.

Who I think will win: I would say at this point its a stacked category, thats a tie between The Big Short/The Revenant/Room/ And Spotlight. I think , Room aside, they all have a chance at it. Maybe the effort of the Revenant and prior awards will take notice though...


Best Director

  • Adam McKay – The Big Short
  • George Miller – Mad Max: Fury Road
  • Alejandro G Inarritu – The Revenant
  • Lenny Abrahamson - Room
  • Tom McCarthy – Spotlight

Who I want: I would be extremely happy with Inarritu winning again, but of course, I tink George Miller would be even more satisfying at this point in his career, cmon go to Valhalla!

Who I think: Probably a near tie between the statistically favored Inarritu from other awards, however he won one last year which puts him at a slight disadvantage to …. McCarthy for critic acclaimed Spotlight....hmmm! Could see a dark horse win by any others too.

Best Actor

  • Bryan Cranston – Trumbo
  • Matt Damon – The Martian
  • Leonardo DiCaprio – The Revenant
  • Michael Fassbender – Steve Jobs
  • Eddie Redmayne – The Danish Girl
Who I want: LEOOOO PLEASEEEEEEE, I THINK THIS IS FINALLY IT! An incredible performance, and hes been nominated so many times and failed I think he just needs to win, and this film was his best chance yet...allll the other awards shows agree for the most part..hoping for a victory cheer Sunday plz..

Who I think: Leo has his highest odds ever, but he is contended by equal shots by Fassbender and Redmayne....well see what happens...

Best Actress
  • Cate Blanchett – Carol
  • Brie Larson – Room
  • Jennifer Lawrence – Joy
  • Charlotte Rampling
  • Saoirse Ronan – Brooklyn

Who I want: I must admit I really have no comment here as I haven't seen any of the above films...... some good choices it seems though

Who I think: My critic watch tells me it's going to be Cate Blanchett rivaled by Larson, could be wrong though...


Best Supporting Actor
  • Christian Bale – The Big Short
  • Tom Hardy – The Revenant
  • Mark Ruffalo – Spotlight
  • Mark Rylance – Bridge of Spies
  • Sylvester Stallone – Creed

Who I want: It would be incredible to see Stallone win a Oscar too, so I'll have to lean towards him. But of course Hardy would be very welcome as well as he was nearly as impressive as Leo was in that film.
Who I think: Stallone actually has great odds from past awards, but I think Bale and Ruffalo contend for this as well ….

Best Supporting Actress
  • Jennifer Jason Leigh
  • Rooney Mara – Carol
  • Rachel McAdams – Spotlight
  • Alicia Vikander – The Danish Girl
  • Kate Winslet – Steve Jobs

Who I want: Considering it was the only film I have seen on this list, I will have to go with Leigh for the Hateful Eight, one of the many highlights there!

Who I think: I think Winslet has this locked down from what I can see and recent shows...


Best Original Screenplay

  • Bridge of Spies
  • Ex-machina
  • Inside Out
  • Spotlight
  • Straight Outta Compton

Who I want: Machina, Inside Out, or Compton all represent the great and out of left field noms that should be more of in the show...so any of those!

Who I think: Could go anyway... I could see an Inside Out, or I could see a Bridge of Spies as making up for its other awards.

Best Adapted Screenplay

  • The Big Short
  • Brooklyn
  • Carol
  • The Martian
  • Room
Who I want: Here I'm going to have to really cheer for The Martian because apparently its a great adaptation and it is as a film and hopefully other wins elsewhere leaves here as its chance to shine

Who I think: Got a feeling on Big Short, Carol, and Room tied....

Best Animated Feature Film
  • Anomalisa
  • Boy & and the World
  • Inside Out
  • Shaun the Sheep Movie
  • When Marnie Was There

Who I want: Inside Out, Pixar's best in years!!!!

Who I think: Depending on how the academy feels on Pixar winning again, either Inside Out or Anomalisa for a more mature film..







Best Animated Short Film
  • Bear Story
  • Prologue
  • Sanjay's Super Team
  • We Can't Live Without Cosmos
  • World of Tommorow

Who I want: World of Tommorow for Herzfeldt's first win please, incredible.

Who I think: Buzz abounds on Sanjay's Super Team

Best Original Score
  • Bridge of Spies
  • Carol
  • The Hateful Eight
  • Sicario
  • Star Wars : The Force Awakens
Who I want: Finally, Star Wars, my favorite thing in the world and movie of the year 2015 on this site. You can guess who I want. Also would be open to the great Hateful Eight score too.

Who I think: For categories like this probably something within conventions like Bridge of Spies or Carol...

Best Sound Editing
  • Mad Max: Fury Road
  • The Martian
  • The Revenant
  • Sicario
  • Star Wars: The Force Awakens

Who I want: I would be happy with any on here, but especially of course Star Wars

Who I think: I can see The Martian or The Revenant having the most critic potential for their ambience.

Best Sound Mixing

  • Bridge of Spies
  • Mad Max: Fury Road
  • The Martian
  • The Revenant
  • Star Wars: The Force Awakens

Who I want: Once again I would be happy with any, but Star Wars too, win them all!

Who I think: Same as above reasons for Martian, Revenant. Or could be a token award for Bridge of Spies...



Best Cinematography
  • Carol
  • The Hateful Eight
  • Mad Max Fury Road
  • The Revenant
  • Sicario
Who I want: The Hateful Eight by far, one of the film's best suits. Would be happy with Mad Max or The Revenant too as always.

Who I think: I could see any about equal, perhaps Sicario dark horse, if not Carol or The Revenant too,

Best Film Editing

  • The Big Short
  • Mad Max: Fury Road
  • The Revenant
  • Spotlight
  • Star Wars: The Force Awakens
Who I want: Star Wars, duh... a lot of good ones here though.

Who I think: I can see The Revenant or Mad Max, or perhaps something like Spotlight.

Best Visual Effects

  • Ex Machina
  • Mad Max: Fury Road
  • The Martian
  • The Revenant
  • Star Wars: The Force Awaken
Who I want: Ahh my favorite category because always the movies right up my alley... and so I will have to choose Star Wars, its best shot of the night, but would be happy with any.

Who I think: I got a shiny and chrome Mad Max feeling, or Revenant for that bear.


Overall neat, we'll see how right I am and if not curious anyways!!! Tune in Sunday evening the 28th.








Sunday, February 14, 2016

Deadpool Review

Deadpool
Director: Tim Miller 
Cast Headliners : Ryan Reynolds, Morena Baccrin, Stefan Kapcic, Ed Skrein, etc
Original Release Date : February 12th, 2016

  There's been a lot of dream movies lately and coming,and Deadpool is without a doubt one of them. It's been a crazy journey. First the character finally appeared but was ruined in 2009's X-men: Origins : Wolverine, which contained a decent brief Wade Wilson but a terribly mis-adapted “The Dead Pool”. Since then rumors of a version that did the character justice have floated around and it seemed to be in production forever. Now, finally, several X-men films and a timeline reboot later, the time has come to deliver on the promise, and it certainly wonderfully does and is the movie a fan would always want and offers a fantastic starting point to this character even if meeting him for the first time.

As fitting for the character, the movie starts off in media res and plays around with time (amongst many other twisting of film conventions and 4th walls!) as it goes on. Right from the first moment we meet Wade Wilson aka Deadpool( Ryan Reynolds, reprising his role from 2009 but damn awesomley right this time) as he goes on hillarious, action-packed rampage tracking down someone named Francis/Ajax (Ed Skrein). The movie's incredibly hillarious and unique sense of humor is noticeable from even the opening credits and its a nonstop ride of blood and laughs over the next couple hours ahead.

Deadpool is the film's title and protagonist but its an understatement that he's the shining blazing wonderful highlight of the film as well. He has a cool perfectly-comics accurate costume (aided by subtle CGI) that luckily stays on for the main majority of the film and he has a regenerating mutant ability that puts Wolverine to shame (and is used in some hillarious moments). These make for incredibly awesome action scenes (aided by the frenetic craft of director Tim Miler) and also give him a sense of immortality not quite like any other super”hero” to grace cinema. But he's no hero, and that's a brilliant point. Deadpool, once he gets his powers, has an insanity to him and a willingness to murder that sets him apart. This leads to plentiful moments that have a combination of badassness, humour, and even a bit of a comment on the way other heroes do things. And all along the way Reynolds fully embodies the character's personality. From his voice , wacky lines, and even the way he moves he's LITERALLY as perfect to the comics as can be. This is true even whether he's in the full costume, unmasked with his mutated makeup face, or pre-powered. This role was the actor's destiny to play, and his wonderfully hillarious perfection in it definitely heals the wounds of his previous X-men appearance and even attempts at other comic movies like Green Lantern, RIPD, and Blade 3. Of course the first two on that list are mocked many times through the film which is another great example of the movie's wacky meta-ness. Everything is something the character would have done on the original iconic pages.

The humor beams out of the amazing central star but it comes from nearly every corner of the world around him as well. The movie is so fortunate to have been rated R as it wouldn't have worked so well as it does without it. The jokes are often dirty, vulgar, and extreme but always hillarious whether referential or uniquely slapstick. The swears and pop culture come constant, fast, and fitting. While one constantly enjoys the Merc with a Mouth's presence the supporting cast has some great lines as well. There's Deadpool's friend Weasel (TJ Miller), roomate Blind Al (Leslie Uggams) and the prime X-men connection that comes in a perfectly comics-accurate, overly noble, and properly Russian recast Colossus (Stefan Kapcic) and his trainee Negasonic Teenage Warhead (Brianna Hildebrand). The character's share the films snappy pace and writing on their own and are magnified when interacting with Deadpool. The X-men connection is prime for some referential jokes but also the movie firmly stands alone as somehthing stand-alone and arguably more fresh and superior to its parent franchise.
Now it takes a bit for this portion to happen and its interestingly mixed with the above but there's also the film's aspect as a origin story and main motivation. Wade Wilson falls in love with Vanessa (Morena Baccarin) in his pre-mutated days. The romantic plot is of course very R-rated , but actually Vanessa and Wade's romance is surprisingly great as well. Baccarin does a great job as the very kind of person Deadpool would find interest in, and their moments together are humorously , darkly charming and memorable. She is arguably one of the best “love interests” around in this genre. Wade seeks a treatment for a immense cancer that develops, and his dark experience and her subsequent kidnapping is what sets the full plot full circle and provides a touching tone at parts.

If anything does not match the fireworks of bloody laughs and fun that is the rest of the film's quality, it's the villians and their role to the plot. Skrein's prime antagonist Ajax is ...there but utterly generic aside from being a pain in Deadpool's side enough to act as a catalyst ( a point which the film itself even mocks). Gina Carano's Angel Dust character is around for fierceness and a couple comedic moments but similiarly fades away in the tapestry of mania that is the rest of the experience. One never feels that anyone Deadpool faces is a threat, and they wouldn't be, but it adds to the aspect of the movie having a very simple plot and progression of events compared to its shenangins elsewhere. But when a person, hardcore comics fan or newcomer, comes to see a Deadpool movie its HIM that counts and it delivers on that. The rest of the opposing force and villians are just a excuse for fun antics, and maybe that's in itself another meta point.


Overall, and this is coming from someone who views Deadpool as one of their favorite comic “characters” (he's not exactly a hero and knows it) , it is nearly a perfect dream come true. This is mainly in the plentiful fun moments and Reynold's starring role. But even in its metaness, insanity, musical choices, and remix of superhero staples (there's a Stan Lee cameo of course) it is exactly the movie it should be and is. More than perhaps a few exceptions in film history, it feels like one is reading a Deadpool comic book that's come to life on screen. That aspect is what counts, and one cannot wait to see where this character goes because it starts of to an amazingly unique, fresh, and yet warmly familiar to hardcore fans start. The newcomer will love it as wel as it just bleeds fun in addition to its red. They made the chimichanga no doubt. 9 out of 10

Zoolander No.2 Review

Zoolander No.2
Director: Ben Stiller 
Cast Headliners : Ben Stiller, Owen Wilson, Will Ferrell, Penelope Cruz
Original Release Date : February 12th, 2016


  The original Zoolander was very much a film of its era of the late 90s/early 00s. Packed with cameos of relevant celebs of the day and having a zany attitude, set of jokes, and colorful fashion aesthetic it definitely stands as one of Ben Stiller's silliest and best in his repertoire. Now a sequel in Zoolander No.2 has arrived, and it mostly carries on from the good aspects of that, Blue Steel included.
The film nicely takes into account the gap since the previous release within the world. After the events of the first film, Derek Zoolander(Ben Stiller, also in the director's chair again) has become secluded in the hilariously desolate icy wilds of “extreme Northern New Jersey” after the death of his wife Matilda(Christine Taylor) and distancing from his son Derek Jr(Cyrus Arnold). Billy Zane (yes, himself as himself) gathers him and his old rival/friend Hansel (Owen Wilson) to attend Don Atari(Kyle Mooney)'s show in Rome and their careers and the film's comedic adventures begin again. Simultaneously, the world's most good looking people are being murdered (including a demise of Justin Bieber that's worth the price of admission) and Interpol agent Melanie Valencia(Penelope Cruz) seeks the help of the supermodel duo.

If this all sounds a little messy, it's because it is. The movie's plot is, as with the first, all over the place with its melding of fashion, comedy, and action. The cast is huge, bringing back pretty much EVERY SINGLE CHARACTER EVER from the first film aside from Derek/Hansel, including Mugatu(Will Ferrell) and his assistant Todd(Nathan Lee Graham) and more that have to be seen. This also includes cameo roles whether in character such as the wacky new additions as villainous Alexanya (Kirsten Wiig), the assistant VIP (Fred Armisen), or as themselves in hillarious and surprisingly meaningful turns by Kiefer Sutherland and Sting and more that have to be witnessed first hand. There's a lot of moments that showcase these cameos for comedic effect and one's enjoyment of the cameo parade is up to them.

But if one seeks the core “plot”, it's a decent silly time as well. Without a doubt out of the sea of characters Stiller's, Wilson's, and Ferrell's turns definitely are the best. They seem to have walked right off the screen of the first installment and have many great lines and moments. Their unique wacky personalities and moments are still here, although it must be said that a large portion of jokes (although not the majority) are just remixes or references to the fact of the same jokes from the old one. When the jokes are taken to the next level, they're humorous, but sometimes the audience may feel deja vu. That's not to say there aren't funny bits of new material as well.


Essentially the film is just a parade of the same wacky classic characters, colorful silly aesthetic , and celeb cameo moments one would expect out of the sequel that this is. It doesn't break major new ground and its short and thin plot holds it back from the originality of the first one. But if one liked that one, this is some overall pretty decent dumb laughs. 7.7 out of 10