The Lego Movie Review

The Lego Movie Review

Directors: Phil Lord and Chris Miller

Cast Headliners: Chris Pratt, Elizabeth Banks, Will Ferrell, Morgan Freeman 

Original Release Date: Febuary 7th, 2014

            Legos are probably one of the best types of toys ever.  If one follows the instructions, they can re-create scenes and things from favored movie/comic/other worlds.  Even more exciting is that they are customizable.  Slap any combo of bricks together and you can make something to call your own. Imagination is the only limit.   The Lego Movie does this amazing franchise justice and shows what the power of imagination can do. Because it is so much more than mere bricks in a computer generated film.

            Emmet, voiced by quintessential average joe Chriss Pratt, is a construction worker in the Lego City. It’s a clever stereotype of our world, with its expensive coffees and daily hustle and bustle.   It’s ruled over by President Business (Will Ferrell) who at first seems mostly genuine but he is quickly established as an nefarious evil mastermind.  He is perfect for this character The characters are all so great in this, something I knew to expect as a fan of Lego media.   There’s the humble Emmet, the cool Wildstyle (Elizabeth  Banks) ,  an crazed 1980’s era space astronaut Benny (Charlie Day),  an fairy cat unicorn Unicat (Allison Brie),  wise sage Vitrivius (Morgan Freeman, of course he’s a god-like character),  cyborg pirate Metalbeard (Nick Offerman), and….. Batman (Will Arnett).  Each is brimming with personality and good moments. How do these various odd people come together?

            One of this movie’s strengths is its mash up of several different Lego worlds.  Like 2012’s Wreck it Ralph, Emmet’s calling as “The Special” transports him between various dimensions.   There’s the basic City,   the Wild West, the Castle medieval era, and so much more. There is an incredible amount of cameos and surprises, both from visual sights to celebrities, that it really is a multiple times must see.  You can tell a lot of heart went into these jokes.  The Batman riff’s are especially great. He’s made into the jerk character you always might of thought of him as.   The humor provides constant chuckles from both its zaniness to its 4^th wall breaking intricacy and allusions. It really can be enjoyed by all ages, since it is so well made. There is something for everyone. One certain cameo segment almost makes the movie worth seeing alone.  Like….oh my.

            It’s not just the mash-up factor of Legoes. The visuals are revolutionary.  The CGI emulates what real physical toys look like quite amazingly well.   The stop-motion style resembles those on YouTube, but on super steroids.  At times it feels like the directors built acres of sets out of legos and moved in close with a camera.  It also seems like at times that is true, with a few live action props seamlessly blended in.  It is mind boggling how they were able to achieve this unique look.

            There is some really great laughs, visuals, and adventure but what really makes The Lego Movie important is its messages.   It could have been just fine as a silly adventure, but the surprises do not just come in the form of cameos. It has an surprisingly deep meaning to its plot which makes itself known in the last segment.  It’s almost a bit of a jarring shift from the rest of the movie. However when it starts to sink in it blows your mind.  Overall it has some great lessons about individuality, imagination, and courage through the whole film. It’s not often I can say this about a CGI movie and especially a Lego movie, but this one made me laugh often, made me awed, made me tear up, and even made me think deeply.  As they say so much in the film, everything is awesome (about it). 8.7 out of 10

The Wolf of Wall Street Review

The Wolf of Wall Street Review

Director : Martin Scorsese

Cast Headliners: Leonardo DiCaprio, Jonah Hill, Margot Robbie, Jon Bernthal, Matthew McConaughey

Original Release Date: December 25th, 2013

            Ah, the stock market. The real Wall Street is a high energy world of big money being moved around and many people moving around huge rooms.  As Michael Douglas once said in a very similarly titled film however, “greed is good.”  The Wolf of Wall Street both provides an often heard of but seldom seen side of the stocks, as well as provoking some interesting thoughts about what money can do to people.

            Jordan Belfort is the main character of the film, played by Leonardo DiCaprio.  The film’s plot uses some interesting time jumps, portraying Jordan’s rise then fall then rise again through the world of the Wall Street stock markets.  His company Stratton-Oakmont evolves along with him, going from something small and rough into an empire.  It is an empire built on lies though.  Jordan is not a good man at all and is incredibly conniving, egotistical, and most of all greedy.  For sure the main point of commendation should be given to DiCaprio here. He is awesome, with incredible range and charisma.  He is just simply firey as he plays Jordan falling into the vices of any rich businessman: sex, drugs, and rock and roll with a massive emphasis on both of the first two.  The film has a shocking amount of partying, narcotic-isation, and fornication taking place.  But from the darkest of debaucheries to the most zany of shenangins, DiCaprio lights up the screen with his words from this fascinating character.   He delivers strongly, but the supporting cast isn’t too shabby either with the equally insane characters of Mark Hanna (played in a unfortunately brief appearance by Matthew McConaughey), Donnie(Jonah Hill), Brad Bodnick(Jon Bernthal) and many more.  It seems that everyone in the cult of personality that is built around Jordan at Stratton-Oakmont is a wild hedon, and it makes for some great chuckles and a form of spectacle.

            The humor comes from the great dialogue, as expected from a Martin Scorsese film.  Scorsese has created a fast-paced movie in both its words and its filming. So many witty words are said in this movie, with most conversations feeling heated as they should.  It’s impressive that stocks, an arguably boring subject, is made into a very thrilling experience, almost like a bank robbery heist, fittingly so considering how Jordan manipulates his victims.  There is also some great moments of extreme insanity that must be seen, quaaludes are a hell of a drug as there’s this one paticuliar part involving them that is an knee slapping outrageous display of both Scorsese’s direction and DiCaprio’s acting.

            The quality of Scorsese is felt but that editing wasn’t one hundred percent perfect however.  The Wolf of Wall Street was supposed to come out a month before its original release date, apparently facing a problem of having way too much content filmed.  And so to fix it, it was delayed to cut it down to improve it since the original draft is said to have been over well over 4 hours long. The print in theaters is at about an exact three hours, and it can be said that maybe more things should have been trimmed.   It seems like the “first part” of the plot takes way longer than the exciting twists near the end, so while I don’t really know what could have been done maybe that is because of some behind the scenes work Scorsese had to juggle with.  This is only a minor grievance however, as all plot points are explained and followed through. There’s just really “so much” to the film that it can be overwhelming.  An example would be many nearly identical scenes of raucousness, we get the point Scorsese.

            What this film is though is a solid Wall Street story, and of this Jordan fellow. It is a mostly great example of an “anti-hero.” It is held mainly up by Leonardo DiCaprio.   It’s a long crawl, but by the end it is very much worth it.  8.75 out of 10

Anchorman 2 Review

Anchorman 2 Review

Director : Adam Mckay

Cast Headliners: Will Ferrell , Steve Carell, Paul Rudd, David Koechner, Christina Applegate 

Original Release Date: December 18th, 2013, seen early December 4th

            The world’s most beloved news anchor ever returns for an ambitious sequel.  Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues reunites Will Ferrell as the titular character with the entire main supporting cast from the last film.  I would call the first one a great comedy. This one brings more of the same, but perhaps can be said to be even better.

            The suave 1970’s have come and gone. The film takes into account the real time between the release of its past entry by moving the time period up to the risky and changing world of the 1980’s.   The legend Ron Burgundy himself is of course the main focus, with Will Ferrell really careering the film and causing laughs with every single world that comes out of his mouth.   His pals Brick Tamland (Steve Carrell), Brian Fantana( Paul Rudd), Champ Kind (David Koechner), and now-wife Veronica Corningstone(Christina Applegate) all return for more chuckles.  There are even more re-appearances that must be seen, I recommend seeing the first one as there are many jokes and references which make it even better for a prior fan.    I think another amazing, and true highlight of the film, is its “cameo” sequence. Fans of the first will know what this means. Like much of the film, it takes that first one and puts it on steroids.

            It’s more of the same, and that’s both a good and not so good thing. More than a handful of jokes are just variations on what has been said before, a common pitfall of comedy sequels although the writing and humor here are overall quality. I do wish the setting of the 1980’s had been involved more as it could lead to more good jokes, instead though it is mostly in the background as the humor is about the many weirdly wonderful characters of the Anchorman world.    Some jokes are slightly stupid, while others cause minutes of laughter.  But one knows what kind of humor to expect from Will Ferrell: weird, wacky, extreme, and yes pure silly fun.

            Ron Burgundy of course is the highlight, but I would say that Brick, already amazing in the first film, is possibly even funnier here. And I mean the funniest.  He really is focused on as a sort of second protagonist with even his own plotline and love interest. It’s quite something to see.  Steve Carrell deserves a shoutout for his amazing hilarious contributions to scenes.

            Like its jokes, the plot twists and turns but like most comedies can’t be truly called “amazing.” It in itself is a large joke, with its tales of how Ron and company change the world with their new 24 hours news format.  There are some occasional emotional moments, but don’t worry on it veering into the melodramatic as it all has a good humorous feeling.   This movie amplifies the amount of cameos, “Extremeness” (you’ll see), and its story scope to a largely good result.  It is an very long film and it can drag on at times, perhaps containing just a bit too much Burgundy power. Overall however, it really is the quality comedy film it looks like. The secret of Harrison Ford is something that is highly recommendable to discover.  8.5 out of 10

The Hobbit:Desolation of Smaug Review

The Hobbit:Desolation of Smaug Review

Director : Peter Jackson

Cast Headliners: Martin Freeman, Ian McKlellan , Richard Armitage, Orlando Bloom, Luke Evans, Evangeline Lilly

Original Release Date: December 13th, 2013

  The Lord of the Rings trilogy of films was a stellar adaption of quintessential fantasy novels.  It worked then since each of the epic three novels were translated into a single movie each, with some things being shuffled around or included into the extended director home video cuts.  Now with these Hobbit prequels, it’s all been made screwy. Originally meant to just be a two part straight up conversion, the singular Hobbit book is now an intricate trilogy of films.  I did enjoy the first part An Unexpected Journey from last year very, very much but that was more of a traditional movie. Because it is pretty obvious that this film was cut from material not meant to standalone, though it has worked out quite well, I will not review it in a normal way. Instead, here are the thoughts of a hardcore Tolkein fan on this crazy creation Peter Jackon has made, The Hobbit: Desolation of Smaug:
LOVED/LIKED:

- Beorn, woah cool fellow!

- Gorgeous Peter Jackson scenery and aesthetic

- Amazing visual effects during action sequences

- Darker vibe than the previous film

- THAT FRICKING BARREL SEQUENCE, amazing.

- Legolas, ludicrously awesome

- Tauriel, an interesting and cool character

- Gandalf’s entire plotline, fan dream to see the Necromancer stuff on screen and makes sense

- The Wood Elves in general, and King Thrainduil

- Oh out of order, but an great spider battle very reminiscent of the bug scene from King Kong, which is a good thing

- When Bilbo has a chance to take, great as always thanks to Martin Freeman

- Lake-town’s vibe and its new characters of Bard(the underrated Luke Evans) and the Master(the wonderful Stephen Fry)

- SMAUG, wow. Amazing choice to use Benedict Cumberbatch who has followed up his performance as Khan with another great villain role. And also the most awe inspiring dragon ive ever seen on film. 

- The ending Smaug action sequences, wow

- The Legolas/Tauriel vs Orcs, well done finale

DIDN’T LIKE/HATED:

-          The very fact it exists in the first place as assembled from other footage, in this case over a third of the film was meant for AUJ
- Not enough Beorn, very rushed and seems much was rushed

-          Less humor/small moments for the characters aka telling the dwarves apart.  Some are still very mysterious, show us more!

-          The darker vibe makes it feel odd, neither hobbit nor LOTR at times and thus nebulous

_-           Bilbo needed more dialogue and focus this time

_-           The Kili/Tauriel/Legolas love triangle, eugh total fan fictionish on Peter Jackson’s part and largely uneeded

_-           Cliffhangers actually being slightly lame, making it feel tense but unfinished!

_-           Perhaps at times the final action set pieces ran a bit long

_-           Evidence of the stretch to three films

Overall, I had a great time seeing it. One can’t deny Peter Jackson’s ability to craft an epic blockbuster. This film contains some of the novel’s best moments, and it comes through to a largely great though not perfect effect.  It feels a bit hodge podge at times, but it really is bursting with a lot of happenings.  It’s one of those middle parts that needs to happen for the final part of the story to work.  This is the “build up” film, and so I take that into consideration when critiquing it.   Because of how LOTR’s final film turned out, I am incredibly excited for the film of next December.  If you’re a fan, you’ll most definitely love it.  If you’re not, don’t see it too much ruckus.   9.05 out of 10

Oldboy Review

Oldboy Review

Director : Spike Lee

Cast Headliners: Josh Brolin, Elizabeth Olsen, Sharlto Copley, Samuel L Jackson

Original Release Date: November 27th, 2013

            Remake films are tricky business.  It is a careful balancing act.  The elements which made the original so great have to be preserved, while also something fresh should be included to avoid it being a simple carbon copy of its source.  The matter is made even more difficult when the source film is from another country, like in this case of Oldboy where it was a South Korean film originally based on a Japanese manga.  The story of Oldboy has now travelled between two mediums and three cultures, and because of this a point of concern for this version may be that it would turn out as a train wreck of mediocrity.   I can say, as a massive fan of Park Chan-wook’s 2003 original that it could have turned out much worse. That’s in a “good way.”

            Josh Brolin plays the protagonist Joe Doucett, an advertising executive.   His life isn’t exactly the best with an venomous relationship with his wife and making some mistakes in his profession.  One such mistake sets him over the edge, and he gets incredibly drunk.  Now, I can say Brolin is one of the best aspects of the movie as Joe.   His character nearly completely transforms over the course of the plot. However, the acting during these drunken scenes felt very exaggerated.  This segment dragged on for a bit too long.  The wonky dialogue reared its head in not just this portion.  It is a shame, since it is about a halfway split between quality writing and “zany” writing.   I would also like to point out that Joe changes from a more interesting seedy character into…. a generic angry action hero. More on that in a moment.

            In many ways Oldboy can be said to be a character study of Joe.   The events of that night lead to the main crux of the film that being the fact that he is mysteriously locked in a hotel-like prison for 20 years with only cereal and Chinese dumplings to eat.    This part, as the original, is incredible.   Some of the finest bits of the film come from Joe’s descent into madness. It is like a dark twisted version of The Count of Monte Cristo, and with his attempted escape that element comes to mind more than the original Korean film.   He has literally no contact for years, which makes this section extremely emotional. I would call it a series of great montages. Director Spike Lee made the smart choice to not directly use the scenes from the original, and instead create new equally dark and surreal imagery.

            His time in his prison shapes Joe into something new. He submits to his isolation at first but soon forges himself into a strong warrior with a mission of revenge.  Soon, he is freed. But his adventure only just started.   I did enjoy the fact that there are a few parallels and references to the original film that I infer to be meant specifically for fans of the original.   For example, to say one, there is no “octopus scene” here, but there is an octopus.  There are also some scenes omitted or occasionally reworked to negative effect. One action sequence copied from the original is the “hammer fight”. But where that fight took place in a single hallway and was beautifully shot in real time, a cinematic achievement, this version uses many special effects and takes place across a few floors of the facility where Joe breaks into.   It feels very much like the blockbuster  “America” version,  and this is not the only other time where this takes place.

            However, some other changes enhance the film over its source. There are additions to the narrative which show how certain things happened or how people got to places.  It would also take much to explain, but the motivation of the villain receives some changes (once again with an element of American larger-than-life exaggeration) which actually make it interesting in its own way.  I will say that Sharlto Copley is great as always in his villain role, and also Samuel L Jackson gives a classic SLJ villian performance as well.  His use of his favorite “m word” is appropriate given the dark and gritty style of the film.   I also think Joe’s soon-ally Marie (Elizabeth Olsen) gets more depth to her than the Korean version.  She is a compassion contrasted to Joe’s brute force.    Ironic that where Marie has a bit more to here, Joe is largely just an angry, though this is what Brolin does best, guy with a grudge.

            There are issues with some of the translation of scenes, and objectively with some of the pacing and dialogue. But these are complimented with a great dark tone, a twisting narrative every bit as engaging as the original, and some bloody action.  A word to describe it would be crazy.  Sometimes, it’s a bit too all over the place.  There were times when the tone jumped from pure black to black comedy; perhaps a trademark of Spike Lee but this isn’t always the place for it.  I also want to mention that where the original had some deep moral messages and introspections, this version eschews that mostly. It’s become a straightforward thriller but is worth it for Josh Brolin , the action, and those plot elements which still carry through.  In my opinion, far from bad if a bit flawed. 7.45 out of 10
            

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire Review

The Hunger Games:Catching Fire Review

Director : Francis Lawrence

Cast Headliners: Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson, Donald Sutherland, Woody Harrelson 

Original Release Date: November 22nd, 2013

            The Hunger Games is starting to become one of those franchises which is poised to be up there with the greats. In the wake of a Harry Potter world, studios sought the next big thing and Lionsgate has found it with the Suzanne Collins trilogy, released a few years back.  Last year’s titular first installment, The Hunger Games, was a pretty good if flawed adaption which delivered the emotional intensity of the book but was brought down by a rough cinematic style and a sem-rough budget.  I personally am a major fan of the series, so I was not upset by any means but I would say “the book is better.” I can happily say that this film surpasses the first both as an movie experience and as a translation of the source.

            The Hunger Games: Catching Fire is that very important middle chapter of the Hunger Games trilogy.  Like other great trilogies, the world is introduced in one installment which may or may not be able to exist on its own as a standalone story.  The first film was a riveting tale of a strange far future world and of Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) and Peeta Mellark (Josh Hutcherson) trying to survive in the death match arena for which the series is named.  Whereas the theme of that was all about merely trying to survive in a fight to the death between youths and the dangerous wilderness, there were hints of so much more.  That is why I adore Catching Fire as my favorite installment of the novels, as it both is an improved version of that survival while bringing in themes of rebelling against the dystopia that is the Capitol.   It is a darker film where all stakes are raised.

            Katniss is recovering from the trauma of the first film.  She nearly died and nearly had Peeta die as well.  She also feels conflicted over Gale (Liam Hemsworth) and of her place in the world.   It is incredibly interesting to see Katniss back in her hometown of District 12 again, changed by the horrors she faced in the arena last go around.  Catching Fire, like its predecessor, is filled with some great characters and performances but it is Jennifer Lawrence who steals the show as Katniss.   She portrays an incredible range of emotions portraying her scarred psyche.  It is easy to see why exactly she becomes such a hero symbol to the citizens of Panem, as it’s easy to feel sympathy her sorrow, to fall in love with her charm, and to cheer her on in her trials.    Katniss is packed with nuance and the now-Oscar winning Ms.Lawrence really delivers the goods when it comes to this.  

            I can say the best thing about this film is that it has MORE.  More of an ensemble cast, from the dashing trident wielding warrior Finnick Odair (Sam Ciaflin),  the eccentric inventor Beetes (Jeffrey Wright), and the new Head Gamemaker Plutarch Heavensbee (Phillip Seymour Hoffman). Plutarch has an especially important role going into the further films, but here Hoffman is a stellar calculating and commanding presence from the Capitol’s control room of the Quarter Quell games which occupy the film’s second half.    Praise must be given to Jena Malone as Johanna Mason, whose spunky fierce attitude makes her a fantastic rival to Katniss.  The returning cast is great too, with Haymitch (Woody Harrelson) having some great quips and even Peeta being even more likeable.   And Donald Sutherland as President Snow, leader of the Capitol, is absolutely menacing. One can tell that when he makes a threat such as promising to kill Katniss’ family, he is going to do it with utmost efficiency. The power drips off every word he says.  Each character has great new development, with more time being given to get to know them. There is some fantastic dialogue and moments.    There’s even once in a while some great and smart humor as well, especially when it involves Haymitch being, well, Woody Harrelson.   And Stanley Tucci’s ridiculous, vile, but also lovable Ceaser Flickmann.

            The characters are amped up to the next level, and so is the story.  The slow but ever increasing spark into uprising by the people of Panem is presented very well, and by the time the chaos leads into the “Quarter Quell” games the intensity is at an all-time new level.   The plot never lets up, with an exciting string of twists, especially the ending which blows away the first films.

            This “Quarter Quell” match of the Hunger Games is the highlight of the film. Last time, it was a standard yearly tournament in the canon of the film’s universe but was shocking for us to see because of its slaughter of kids.  This time however, more time is spent leading to the circumstances of why this emergency game is forced upon Katniss which makes it start pack even more emotional intensity. Her opponets were children this time, but now it is a sort of all-stars match of past victors, many of them who are older and more experienced than her and Peeta.   The arena packs dangerous threats, from poisonous fog (one of the standout sequences) to giant killer monkeys to tidal waves and more.  The threats created by the Capitol are incredibly extreme, making the frequent set pieces excellent and leaving one on the edge of their seat.

            The plot, characters, and Hunger Games themselves are injected with steroids of quality, but perhaps one of the greatest things about Catching Fire is the new talent behind the scenes.   The new director is Francis Lawrence, of I Am Legend fame. Like that film, there are some incredible views of desolate landscapes such as the mountains of District 12 and the ominous metropolis of the Capitol.  The world feels very finely crafted and authentic which gives proof that he was a perfect choice for this world.  Whether it be by his choice or not, the most welcomed improvement of this movie is that it does not have the “realistic camera” of the first film. The closed in, shaking camera has been avoided making everything crystal clear and eye appealing. This makes the fast moving energetic scenes much more tolerable on the eyes, and thus the entire film is candy for the eye.  It can be inferred that an impressive budget was put into this as well, with special effects dazzling. Catching Fire does not like in amazing futuristic technology, and it seems very real here.   After seeing the wonderful work done here, I am pleased to hear that he has been contracted for all future films in the franchise. 

            Overall, Catching Fire is, to say the truth, awesome.  Its dark tale ranges the gamut of emotion from sorrow to anger to adventure.  Deeper themes of rebellion and the meaning of society begin to rear their heads, and each moment brings something more.    It is an exciting installment in an exciting franchise, and this time it truly delivers on the promise of what Hunger Games is all about. Once again I can say as a fan, it was everything I wanted and even a bit more.  I loved seeing the perspective of President Snow and Plutarch, which was absent in the book. I loved seeing new lines of humorous dialogue made from the film, such as Katniss, Haymitch, Peeta, and Johanna meeting for the first time.  I loved seeing the epic moments in the Quarter Quell come to life, which was nearly every moment in that arena.   This is both an exciting blockbuster and a thought provoking saga. This, like its source novel,  is a must-experience  and one of the best things of the year if not in many years.  9 out of 10

           

           

            

Reviewmania: Don Jon/Rush/The Wackness/Now You See Me/Rush/Cloudy2/The Family/Metallica/AfterEarth/Gatsby : Crazy Mini Review Roundup to mid October 2013

You may have noticed it's been a long time since my last review. Im really sorry, besides watching movies and reviewing them I am a full time student who is very busy.  and also when so many reviews stack up i have no choice but to combine them like this.  Anyways, here are some movies I feel like i must say something about I've seen over the past while, both in theaters and DVD. very quick critique and a score on each. cya next full review!


(let's begin)


-Don Jon: Guy is addicted to porn, turns his life around. some good laughs, warning alot of nudity, and a decent dramatic  story with quality acting from JGL/ScarJo/Julliane Moore.  some bad writing at times. 7.8 out of 10

-The Wackness:  Rap loving guy is addicted to drugs, sorta turns his life around.  Great 90's vibe and recreation. great story. Great ben kingsley. great soundtrack.  josh peck's best performance of his life. classic coming of age feels. indie charn. 8.65 out of 10

-Now You See Me: Magicians rob bank, shenangins.   great ensemble cast, funny witty writing.   decent special effects, interesting magician crime plot.  some plot holes and questionable twists. 8.2 out of 10

-Rush:  F1 Racing rivalry in the 70's. great story, great racing intensity.  quality performances from Chris Hemsworth and Daniel Bruhl.  overall quality movie for what it is. 8.25 out of 10

-Cloudy With A Chance of Meatballs 2: the food themed CGI movie returns, with a island of food animals. great color, decent charm. decent plot for what it is. a solid example of chi. 8.1 out of 10

-The Family:  Ex-Mafia movie in France, one crazy family.  great Robert De Niro and  Michelle Pfeiffer and Tommy Lee Jones.  OK storyline. great writing. ok direction. not perfect, but fun. 7.65 out of 10

-Metallica through the Never:  Metallica plays a concert during some trippy riot sub story. only for metallica fans, but band gives a objectively awesome performance. looks quality in 3d.  visual plot makes no sense but some good dark prats.  8 out of 10

-After Earth: shymalayan and the father/son Will and Jaden smith team up for a sci fi about earth with different animals and aliens. Alot of problems, oh my. Pretty visuals, interesting concept. WEIRD and bad dialogue that's a distraction. jaden's worst performance ever, will's lame performance. way too short. some palm facing parts.   very flawed, wasted potential with a hint of what couldve been redeeming it from complete failure but kinda bad. 5.85 out of 10


-The Great Gatsby: adaptation of the classic partying city novel.  Macguire is kinda lame, Leo Cap is pretty good. too slow at times.  out of place but unique soundtrack, good and bad depending on the times.  great beatiful color scheme and visuals. some questionable moments of why they filmed what they filmed. 7.7 out of 10


and that's all!